CLINICAL RESOURCES
Bone Graft Quality
Not all bone grafts are created equal. See how OSSIFY Mineralized Cancellous allograft compares — backed by histological data from the University of Minnesota.
Many dentists are overwhelmed by the many bone graft material options available on the market today.
To evaluate the quality of our bone graft material, studies were performed by expert clinicians with many years of bone grafting experience. Studies included simple socket preservation, sinus augmentation, as well as advanced Guided Bone Regeneration and ridge augmentation procedures.
After 3, 4, or 5-month healing periods (depending on procedure difficulty), the surgical sites were analyzed, compared, and evaluated.
INDEPENDENT HISTOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
Hard Tissue Research Lab
University of Minnesota
After 4 months of healing with Surgical Esthetics' Mineralized Cancellous allograft, histological analysis was performed by the Hard Tissue Research Lab at the University of Minnesota.
These results are shown below, as compared to publicly available data from a few of the largest allograft companies in the market.
HISTOLOGICAL COMPARISON DATA
Comparison based on publicly available histological data from leading allograft manufacturers. Analysis performed by the Hard Tissue Research Lab, University of Minnesota.
WHY IT MATTERS
Vital bone cells are the goal
When choosing an allograft, it's important to choose the highest-quality material that will turn over into living, vital bone cells. These cells can help the osseous structures respond to occlusal forces and fortify the bone surrounding implants. With fewer vital bone cells, and more residual graft material, long-term stability of dental implants may be compromised.
READY TO UPGRADE?
Choose the highest-quality allograft.
OSSIFY Mineralized Cancellous allograft — backed by independent histological data.